I dreamt an entire screenplay last night - as in, the dream was me writing a screenplay from...
Still my #1 hero
i definitely got into a really long argument this weekend with a real adult human being about kanye west. they...
Earlier today this one girl was talking about how racism only happens if you’re too sensitive and that words are just words and...
Add a tag if the person was someone you already knew it real life...
You know that makes me uncomfortable? You know what I live with everyday?
RACISM!
I can and will react and respond to behavior that not only...
#20 - Parker (2013) Taylor Hackford - 1/29/2013
First of all, if you’re a fan of the character Parker as popularized by Darwyn Cooke, run away as fast as you can, for you’ll be sorely disappointed. A movie based on the Parker of The Hunter or The Outfit, with a visual style influenced by Cooke, would have been an amazing movie indeed.
What we get, instead, is an action/heist-ish movie that’s all process and almost no payoff, based on one of the later Parker stories. If the film is faithful to the book (Flashfire), it makes me think that perhaps Donald Westlake was getting soft in his golden years. Gone is the cold cruelty of Parker, an uncaring, ruthless force. In his place is a truffle of a Parker - a hard outer shell with the calculated drive to regain what he is owed because of the principle of it all, but with a gooey center.
As an action/heist-ish movie, it’s not terrible, but I was far too disappointed by what could have been to be anywhere near satisfied with what I got. Jason Statham is perfectly serviceable, but there must be something in his contract where he always has to play the bad boy with a heart of gold. It’s annoying. Parker shouldn’t have a heart of gold, he shouldn’t have a heart. The rest of the performances ranged from not bad/strange (J Lo, Patti LuPone) to terrible (Michael Chiklis, Nick Nolte). I quite liked Emma Booth as Parker’s girlfriend, and actually didn’t mind the character too much.
Along with Magic Mike and Killing Them Softly, this is another movie played against a background of the economic crisis. Leslie (Lopez) is a casualty of the economic meltdown, desperately needing (and failing) to sell luxury that she can never afford. Lopez did an excellent job in the moment where she expresses her frustration at being constantly faced with that irony, but the movie treated that moment almost as a throwaway in the scene and in the film. Where Magic Mike subtly infused details of the economy into almost every scene, or where Killing Them Softly made very loud and very angry comments about the economy in almost every scene, Parker wastes an opportunity to make a much more interesting statement.
I found Leslie to be a compelling character, yet puzzling. Lopez does a very good job portraying her resiliency in the face of economic despair. It’s clear that the character is supposed to be sharp and perceptive, which I liked, but Lopez also plays the character a bit ditzy, which I didn’t like, but that in itself is an interesting comment on a woman who is smarter than she looks and who knows she can use that to her advantage at times, so maybe I liked that choice after all? I also wasn’t quite sure of what to make of Leslie’s overt attraction to Parker/ desperate seduction attempts. It was kind of refreshing to see a woman’s sexual desires shown, something not commonly shown in this way. It was also kind of refreshing to see audience expectations subverted. But it was also disconcerting to see it played as sad desperation.
I loved the look of the place markers, but they could have used a few more; the inconsistency felt sloppy. All of the daytime scenes felt too bright and washed out, and enough with the goddamn close ups!
But what bothered me most were the flashbacks - never my favorite technique, even when done well, but here they were particularly inelegant and just plain dumb. Especially when Parker is reliving a scene that happened exactly five minutes ago, that the audience all lived through exactly five minutes ago, and which was particularly painful the first time around.
This isn’t a terrible movie, but there’s almost nothing surprising or outstanding about it, nothing that really elevates this movie to something I would recommend.
This is a movie that Tim and I watched for our Spoiler Series.
Lockout (2012) James Mather, Stephen St. Leger
Overall, it’s pretty standard Luc Besson - good concept, lots of action, ridiculous and over-the-top. Kind of like District B13, but more boring and annoying.
It really hinges on Guy Pearce, and he’s just terrible - he plays a wisecracking guy with an attitude, who never gets beyond plain obnoxious. It’s like they wanted to get Mark Wahlberg but couldn’t (?!?!). Pearce just doesn’t pull it off.
#232 - 12/11/2012
The Raid: Redemption (2011) Gareth Evans
I once read an interview with game director David Jaffe, who talked about his goal in creating God of War:
“I didn’t want to make a game that put you in the shoes of Indiana Jones,” he clarified, “I wanted to put you in the shoes of the 10-year-old kid watching Indiana Jones.”
The Raid kinda does the opposite - it is a film that puts you in the shoes of a 10-year-old kid playing an Indiana Jones video game on meth.
I was also reminded of the commentary from Drunken Master - in it, the commentators talked about how the American action movie directors filmed their action scenes very tightly, partly because they grew up watching kung fu movies on TV, pan-and-scan style. Here, it’s as if Gareth Evans grew up watching people play Soul Caliber. It is truly the kind of film made by the kids who grew up playing video games.
The plot and structure also add to the feeling that you’re inside of an elaborate video game. It’s like a platformer where you fight through endless waves of enemies (many of them zombie-like), working your way up to the sub-bosses and then the big boss, Critical Finish.
I enjoyed The Raid, if only because of the chance to see Iko Uwais put on another pencak silat clinic. Although the storyline was very poor, it was also fairly nonexistent; compared to Evans’ earlier film, Merantau, that is actually an improvement.
Also, shit, what a difference a haircut makes. Men, cut your damn hair.
#181 - 9/1/2012
Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) James Cameron
What an exhilarating surprise. I know I had seen this before, but I didn’t remember much (if you are thinking I have a horrible memory, you are correct). I’m pretty sure I haven’t seen the first. A lot of this type of picture has gone out of vogue, but I think it’s certainly still worth watching. It’s got outrageous action, it’s got lots of cheesy humor, it’s got thrills that made me physically lean away from the screen, it’s got the governator…what else do you need?
I love these 80s/90s screenplays where everything has a reason for being (I’m thinking Jurassic Park, Die Hard, etc.) - they’re a lot of fun, in a roll-your-eyes-but-still-smile kind of way. There’s something very charming about it. Certainly cheesy, but charming.
Linda Hamilton is one badass motherfucker. Not the greatest actress, but her arms are insane. There’s a great scene where Sarah Conner attacks with a stick, and there’s a split second white frame during the POV shot that’s just great.
I thought the almost horror movie kills were pretty interesting. Robert Patrick as the T-1000 is totally frightening, and the music that plays as his theme is absolutely fantastic. I think that might have been my favorite part.
Overall, super fun.
#166 7/25/2012
Triad Election (2006) Johnnie To
After watching The Mission, I needed more Johnnie To. More! All Johnnie To all the time. Triad Election (or Election 2) is a sequel to Election, and a continuation of his “power, but at what cost?” theme.
As the politics get more brutal and the moral compromises more horrifying, so do the action set-pieces. Triad Election is not one of To’s more light-hearted ventures. There is humor, but it is dark dark dark.
I found this to be a big improvement on Election, which I thought was just alright. More exciting, higher stakes, better characters.
#132 - 6/11/2012
Haywire (2011) Steven Soderbergh
Highly anticipated, liked but not loved. It certainly did deliver on fight sequences, and I loved the gender play. In most action movies you tend to question the ability of the women to realistically partake in those fights (although I thought Paula Patton in M:I-GP was pretty good). In this action movie, you question whether Michael Fassbender or Ewan McGregor could realistically hold their own against Gina Carano. Also, look at them! They just fought and they look like shit! So I enjoyed the verisimilitude. I think Gina could go on to make more, better movies, but she would have to be in the right hands. I could see her working with Tarantino or Rodriguez.
I listened to an interview with her, and was surprised by how emotive she was. So her acting appears to be a direction; I thought of Le Samourai and how difficult it is to do silence.
Also, remind me to never go see a movie on opening weekend ever again.
#17 - 1/20/2012