Maybe Yahoo ( or some other behemoth ) buys Tumblr. Maybe they ruin it. Maybe it’s ruined so badly that I stop using Tumblr. ( That would have to be...
omfg i’m crying at the latest episode of Got because daenerys is listening to this guy and she’s so tired of his bullshit and she...
George Takei responds to “traditional” marriage fans.
George Takei: One Million / Those idiots: negative infinity.
My job title is Outreach and Grants Manager. I will also be the spokesperson for the organization, doing all press and appearances.
I will be...
I could watch this GIF for days. Is it real? I don’t even care. It’s so good; the animated GIF as a method for reorganizing...
Samsara (2011) Ron Fricke
While undeniably beautiful, this film left a bad taste in my mouth. Samsara is a series of images, cut together in fairly rapid succession, taking the viewer on a “global” tour of the “cultures of the world”. Some images are meant to be purely aesthetically beautiful (which they are), some images are meant to be confrontational. But as these are just images, without context, and in the absence of any explicit narrative, the meaning comes from montage, and I did not care for that meaning.
Yes, there is confrontation, but there is also exploitation and exoticization. Unlike (from what I hear) Baraka, Samsara concerns itself mainly with humans. The near absence of white people, except for a few shots from the American south (there are probably others, but not many) tells me that Fricke is not so much focused on painting a full portrait of humanity, but on painting an exotic portrait of the Other for art-consumers (rich, white) to experience (with that experience ending in the theatre). I am still interested in seeing Baraka, but Samsara rubbed me the wrong way.
#190 - 9/16/2012
Edited to add - some additional thoughts